Wednesday, November 06, 2002
we also had a big talk about the one vs two thing last night.
it worries me he's so keen to avoid risking any disability. not that I don't concur, just that he's not sure how he'd deal with a disabled child, and we can't ever guarantee it won't happen.
will probably go for two first time to avoid risks of freezing, then will ask: what are the risks of twins? is there any reason apart from speed of putting two in at at time? b/c if it's just that one in 10 will take so it takes up to 10 months to get one, rather than five to get one and maybe two (they have about 20 % twins on this program), then maybe we should be going more slowly. I'm only 36 and it's so much safer.
I also want to know if there are any rh implications of twins; eg eliminating second-pregnancy risks, or perhaps two at once risks one being attacked?
I'm rh negative, he's positive. bummer.
it worries me he's so keen to avoid risking any disability. not that I don't concur, just that he's not sure how he'd deal with a disabled child, and we can't ever guarantee it won't happen.
will probably go for two first time to avoid risks of freezing, then will ask: what are the risks of twins? is there any reason apart from speed of putting two in at at time? b/c if it's just that one in 10 will take so it takes up to 10 months to get one, rather than five to get one and maybe two (they have about 20 % twins on this program), then maybe we should be going more slowly. I'm only 36 and it's so much safer.
I also want to know if there are any rh implications of twins; eg eliminating second-pregnancy risks, or perhaps two at once risks one being attacked?
I'm rh negative, he's positive. bummer.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]